Pear’s Soap was not, by most accounts, a conventional brand failure. Indeed, it was one of the longest-running brands in marketing history.
The soap was named after London hairdresser Andrew Pears, who patented its transparent design in 1789. During the reign of Queen Victoria, Pear’s Soap became one of the first products in the UK to gain a coherent brand identity through intensive advertising. Indeed, the man behind Pear’s Soap’s early promotional efforts, Thomas J Barratt, has often been referred to as ‘the father of modern advertising.’

Barrat also helped Pear’s Soap break into the US market by getting the hugely influencial religious leader Henry Ward Beecher to equate cleanliness, and Pear’s particularly, with Godliness. Once this had been achieved Barratt bought the entire front page of the New York Herald in order to show off this incredible testimonial.
The ‘Bubbles’ campaign, featuring an illustration of a baby boy bathed in bubbles, was particularly successful and established Pear’s as a part of everyday life on both sides of the Atlantic. However, Barratt recognized the ever changing nature of marketing. ‘Tastes change, fashions change, and the advertiser has to change with them,’ the Pear’s advertising man said in a 1907 interview. ‘An idea that was effective a generation ago would fall flat, stale, and unprofitable if presented to the public today. Not that the idea of today is always better than the older idea, but it is different – it hits the present taste.’
Throughout the first half of the 20th century, Pear’s remained the leading soap brand in the UK. However, towards the end of the century the market was starting to radically evolve.
Over the past 100 years, soap has reflected the development of consumer culture. Some of the earliest brand names were given to soap; it was one of the first mass-produced goods to be packaged and the subject of some of the earliest ad campaigns. Its manufacturers pioneered market research; the first TV ads were for soap; soap operas, tales of domestic melodrama, were so named because they were often sponsored by soap companies. Soap made men rich – William Hesketh Lever, the 33-year-old who built Port Sunlight [where Pear’s was produced], for one – and it is no coincidence that two of the world’s oldest and biggest multinationals, Unilever and Procter & Gamble, rose to power on the back of soap.
Recently though, a change has emerged. The mass-produced block has been abandoned for its liquid versions – shower gels, body washes and liquid soap dispensers. In pursuit of our ideal of cleanliness, the soap bar has been deemed unhygienic.

So why had Pear’s lost its power? Well, the shift towards liquid soaps and shower gels was certainly a factor. But Unilever held onto Dove, another soap bar brand, which still fares exceptionally well. Ultimately, Pear’s was a brand
What were the lessons learned from the Pear’s case? Well, firstly, every brand has its time. Pear’s Soap was a historical success, but the product became incompatible with contemporary trends and tastes. Secondly, advertising can help build a brand. But brands built on advertising generally need advertising to sustain them.
Taken from HERE.
Advertising is an essential effort that determines the sales of goods in every purchasing company. But the brand awareness should also be balance with the brand development, on how the product could always get along with the present and the most up-to-date condition of the market. This is when the company needs innovation and creativity to thrive. When Pears was not agile enough to meet the new demand of the consumer, which is a liquefied soap, it would be left out. It might be harder for Pears, though, as it works under Unilever as the parent company that have the authority to make the industry as effective and as lean as possible. But the opportunity is always there. Suppose at that time, Pears was able to produce and promote the liquid soap with the advertisement as booming as it used to be, the company would be able to develop broadly like what Dove has been right now. Nonetheless, the brand is not really being shut down on the entire world. Pears are still in commercial under the Unilever in India, producing the same yellow bar soap.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, this is actually an interesting example of the importance of marketing. Any product that would like to be favoured by the target market should know the current demand of the market in order to provide and fulfill their want or need. If any brand refuses to do so, it is most likely for them to be left out in the industry as competitors keep on trying to keep up with the current trend that is possible to achieve their target market. Regarding the article posted above, pears soap seem to prefer its originality of producing bar soap instead of producing liquid soap. It is okay though, perhaps, pears' intention was to maintain its originality by not fulfilling the market demand of liquid soap by that time. However, what pears' soap can provide and what the market is demanding do not meet. Therefore, pears soap started to be beaten by other brands.
ReplyDelete